The Tried Assassin
Story Summary
In "The Tried Assassin," a courtroom drama unfolds as an assassin stands trial in a New England court. His counsel argues for dismissal based on a previous acquittal in California, invoking the principle of "once in jeopardy." However, the judge denies the motion, stating that an assassin is not considered to be in jeopardy when tried in California, allowing the trial to proceed—a reflection of the complexities found in popular moral stories and animal stories with moral lessons.
Click to reveal the moral of the story
Justice can vary significantly between jurisdictions, and what may be deemed lawful in one place may not be recognized in another.
Historical Context
This story draws from the broader themes of justice and morality often explored in American literature, particularly during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The notion of a trial for an assassin reflects historical tensions around vigilantism and legal jurisdiction, especially in the context of the Wild West, where law enforcement was often seen as inadequate. The narrative also evokes elements of courtroom dramas prevalent in works like Edgar Allan Poe's "The Tell-Tale Heart" and later, the legal thrillers of the 20th century, emphasizing the complexities of legal definitions and human ethics in crime and punishment.
Our Editors Opinion
This story highlights the complexities of justice and accountability in modern legal systems, reminding us that the pursuit of truth can sometimes be hindered by jurisdictional boundaries and differing legal standards. For instance, a modern scenario might involve a high-profile individual accused of financial crimes in one state but acquitted, then facing similar charges in another state, prompting debates about the integrity of the justice system and the implications of double jeopardy when laws vary significantly across jurisdictions.
You May Also Like
The Judge and the Plaintiff
In this captivating moral story, a businessman awaits a court ruling against a railway company and, in a moment of levity, offers to split the potential damages with the judge. However, the judge, realizing his mistake, reveals that he has already ruled in the plaintiff's favor, prompting the businessman to retract his offer and express gratitude instead. This simple moral story highlights the importance of integrity and honesty in the face of temptation.
A Hasty Settlement
In "A Hasty Settlement," an attorney proposes to reopen a concluded estate case after realizing there may be remaining assets, prompting the judge to reconsider the initial valuation. This concise moral story highlights the importance of diligence and the potential for overlooked opportunities, reminding readers that lessons learned from stories can inspire a deeper understanding of justice and fairness in seemingly settled matters.
The Massacre
The story explores the contrasting perspectives on the deaths of Christian missionaries in China, labeled as "Bigoted Heathens" by the Christian press. Through the eyes of a character who reflects on the articles, the narrative critiques the disdain for locals while humorously noting that "Ying Shing," meaning "Rock Creek," is a reminder of the simplicity found in very short moral stories. This thought-provoking tale invites readers to consider the moral complexities behind the labels we assign to others.
Other names for this story
"Trial of the Assassin, Acquitted Assassin, Justice for the Assassin, The Assassin's Defense, Verdict of the Assassin, The Assassin's Trial, Courtroom Confrontation, The Assassin's Reckoning"
Did You Know?
This story highlights the complexities of legal jurisdiction and the concept of double jeopardy, illustrating how differing legal systems can lead to unique interpretations of justice, particularly when it comes to serious crimes like assassination.
Subscribe to Daily Stories
Get a new moral story in your inbox every day.